Pay in installments of $6.47 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 14 - Nov 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
surezone herbicide NuFarm SureGuard EZ HerbicideResidual Control that Lasts Now in a Convenient Liquid Formula New from Nufarm, liquid SureGuard EZ provides an exceptional value that allows you to offer more and make more a perfect solution for your customers. SureGuard EZ delivers the same long lasting residual control of grass and broadleaf weeds that youve come to expect from SureGuard in a new convenient liquid formulation. Also, SureGuard EZ enhances the speed and spectrum of glyphosate when
Residual Control that Lasts – Now in a Convenient Liquid Formula |
|
| TOUGH CONTROL, QUICK |
|
| USE SUMMARY |
|
WOODY LANDSCAPE ORNAMENTALS AND BARE GROUND AREAS Application of SureGuard EZ in the vicinity of ornamental plants is limited to directed sprays around well established woody shrubs and conifer and deciduous trees listed in the product label. SureGuard EZ may also be applied to maintain bare ground in non-crop areas as listed in the product label. Do not apply this product within any enclosed structure in residential or commercial properties. Pre-emergence Weed Control: Mix 0.21 - 0.42 fluid ounces of this product per gallon of spray solution and apply 1 gallon of spray solution to 500 - 1,000 square feet prior to weed germination. Apply to weed-free soil, mulch, or gravel surfaces. Moisture is necessary to activate this product on soil for residual weed control. Post-emergence Weed Control: Mix 0.21 - 0.42 fluid ounces of this product per gallon and apply 1 gallon of spray solution to 500 - 1,000 square feet to actively growing weeds. Tank mixing this product with glyphosate will increase the spectrum of post-emergent weed control and provide faster post-emergent weed control than glyphosate alone. Established landscape ornamentals have shown tolerance to applications of this product only when applied to the soil at the base of the plant and sprays do not directly contact or drift onto desirable plants. For maximum plant safety when using around desirable ornamentals, direct applications of this product (or this product plus glyphosate) toward the soil and leave a sufficient non-treated buffer to ensure spray solution does not contact desired plants. DORMANT BERMUDAGRASS (Only for use in certain states, see product label) SureGuard EZ may be applied as a single or split application to well established dormant Bermudagrass. It will provide pre-emergence and early post-emergence control of annual bluegrass, chickweed, henbit and other winter annual weeds listed in the product label and pre-emergence control of crabgrass, goose grass and other summer annual weeds listed in the product label. Application of this product to actively growing turfgrass or during green-up may cause unacceptable injury. Broadcast Application: Apply 8 - 12 fluid ounces of this product per broadcast acre as a pre-emergence application. If weeds are present at the time of application apply this product plus an adjuvant (0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant). Make post-emergence applications when weeds are actively growing and no larger than 2” in height. Thorough spray coverage is necessary to maximize the post-emergence activity. When applied after weed germination, this product will provide pre-emergence and post-emergence control of broadleaf weeds and grasses listed in the product label. Post-emergence weed control may be more effective on certain weed species, and may not control mature, stressed or hardened off weeds that are not actively growing at the time of application. Spot Treatment: Mix 0.42 fluid ounces per gallon of this product and 2 teaspoons (1/3 fluid ounces) of non-ionic surfactant in 1 gallon of water and apply 1 gallon of spray solution per 1,000 square feet. Occasionally shake the spray solution while spraying to ensure the spray solution remains well mixed. Spray the target weeds until the leaves are wet. See label for complete use directions. |
| RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS |
| DO NOT apply to golf course putting greens. DO NOT apply to warm-season turfgrass that has been over seeded with cool-season turfgrass. DO NOT irrigate within 1 hour before/after application or apply if rain is expected within 1 hour. DO NOT apply more than 2 applications at 12 fl. oz./Acre or 3 applications at 8 fl. oz./year. DO NOT apply in fall before turfgrass has ceased active growth or in late winter/early spring after turfgrass has resumed active growth. DO NOT re-apply this product within 30 days. Allow 8 weeks between application and seeding or sodding of turfgrass. |
STATES NOT REGISTERED
AK
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written.
Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier.
My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author.
Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing.
And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot...
In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026